NewsBytes Stage
    Hindi
    More
    In the news
    Narendra Modi
    Amit Shah
    Box Office Collection
    Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP)
    OTT releases
    Hindi
    NewsBytes Stage
    India
    Business
    World
    Politics
    Sports
    Technology
    Entertainment
    Auto
    Lifestyle
    Career
    Visual Stories
    Find Cricket Statistics

    Download Android App

    Follow us on
    • Facebook
    • Twitter
    • Linkedin
    Home / News / India News / Vinod Dua sedition FIR quashed; Supreme Court cites 1962 order
    Next Article
    Vinod Dua sedition FIR quashed; Supreme Court cites 1962 order
    Every journalist is entitled to protection under a 1962 order, the Supreme Court observed.

    Vinod Dua sedition FIR quashed; Supreme Court cites 1962 order

    By Siddhant Pandey
    Jun 03, 2021
    12:46 pm

    What's the story

    The Supreme Court on Thursday quashed the FIR filed against journalist Vinod Dua in connection with a sedition case.

    The case was filed by a Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP) leader in Himachal Pradesh last year over Dua's YouTube show criticizing Prime Minister Narendra Modi and the central government.

    The Supreme Court observed that every journalist is entitled to protection under a 1962 judgment.

    Court

    Court had reserved order last October

    A bench of Justices UU Lalit and Vineet Saran had heard the case against Dua and had reserved the judgment on October 6, 2020.

    It observed, "Every journalist is entitled to the protection under the Kedar Nath Singh judgment," LiveLaw reported.

    The Kedar Nath Singh judgment defined the ambit of offenses under Section 124A of the Indian Penal Code, which pertains to sedition.

    Quote

    What does the 1962 order say?

    In the 1962 order, the SC had read down Section 124A, noting that its application should be limited to "acts involving intention or tendency to create disorder, or disturbance of law and order; or incitement to violence."

    "...mere strong words used to express disapprobation of the measures of the government with a view to their improvement or alteration by lawful means" is not sedition.

    Other details

    Prayer to form committee to clear FIRs against journalists rejected

    However, the SC rejected another prayer made by Dua, which had sought the constitution of a committee to verify allegations against journalists before an FIR is lodged.

    Dua had prayed that FIRs should not be registered against journalists with over 10 years of experience unless cleared by the committee.

    The SC said that this prayer would be an encroachment into the legislative domain.

    Case

    BJP leader Ajay Shyam had filed complaint over Dua's show

    The case against Dua was registered after a complaint filed by BJP leader Ajay Shyam over the journalist's YouTube show.

    The FIR was filed at the Kumarsain Police station in Shimla district on May 6, 2020, for sedition, public nuisance, printing defamatory materials, and public mischief.

    According to the complaint, Dua had accused PM Modi of using "deaths and terror attacks" to get votes.

    Background

    Dua's show was regarding communal violence in Delhi

    The YouTube show in question was regarding communal violence in Delhi last February.

    Shyam had complained that Dua made "bizarre allegations" in the show dated March 30, 2020, and instigated violence against Modi and the government.

    The violence had erupted during protests against the Citizenship Amendment Act (CAA).

    Over 50 people were killed, while at least 200 were injured in the clashes.

    Facebook
    Whatsapp
    Twitter
    Linkedin
    Related News
    Latest
    Supreme Court Of India
    Vinod Dua

    Latest

    Bangladesh Cricket Board pondering over Bangladesh's tour of Pakistan Bangladesh Cricket Board
    Why Virat Kohli's presence could lift India in England? Stats Virat Kohli
    Google Workspace accounts gain access to Gemini Live feature Google
    Adani Group deploys India's 1st hydrogen-powered truck in Chhattisgarh Adani Group

    Supreme Court Of India

    Win for Tata Sons; Supreme Court upholds Cyrus Mistry's sacking Ratan Tata
    Supreme Court refuses stay on electoral bonds ahead of polls India
    SC refuses to quash FIR against Sushant Singh Rajput's sister Sushant Singh Rajput
    Coronavirus impact: Pending cases in courts increase manifold High Court

    Vinod Dua

    #MeToo: Vinod Dua deserves place in hall-of-shame, says accuser Facebook
    #MeToo: On charges leveled against father Vinod Dua, Mallika responds India
    #MeToo: Committee formed to investigate allegations on Vinod Dua dissolved India
    Why BJP minister Hardeep Puri helping Mallika Dua irked netizens? X
    Indian Premier League (IPL) Celebrity Hollywood Bollywood UEFA Champions League Tennis Football Smartphones Cryptocurrency Upcoming Movies Premier League Cricket News Latest automobiles Latest Cars Upcoming Cars Latest Bikes Upcoming Tablets
    About Us Privacy Policy Terms & Conditions Contact Us Ethical Conduct Grievance Redressal News News Archive Topics Archive Download DevBytes Find Cricket Statistics
    Follow us on
    Facebook Twitter Linkedin
    All rights reserved © NewsBytes 2025