NewsBytes Stage
    Hindi
    More
    In the news
    Narendra Modi
    Amit Shah
    Box Office Collection
    Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP)
    OTT releases
    Hindi
    NewsBytes Stage
    India
    Business
    World
    Politics
    Sports
    Technology
    Entertainment
    Auto
    Lifestyle
    Career
    Visual Stories
    Find Cricket Statistics

    Download Android App

    Follow us on
    • Facebook
    • Twitter
    • Linkedin
    Home / News / India News / Sanatan Dharma row: SC pulls up Udhyanidhi over writ petition 
    Summarize
    Next Article
    Sanatan Dharma row: SC pulls up Udhyanidhi over writ petition 
    Udhayanidhi had sought clubbing of multiple FIRs registered against him for his 'eradicate Sanatan Dharma' remark

    Sanatan Dharma row: SC pulls up Udhyanidhi over writ petition 

    By Tanya Shrivastava
    Apr 01, 2024
    06:40 pm

    What's the story

    The Supreme Court has informed Tamil Nadu Minister and Dravida Munnetra Kazhagam leader Udhayanidhi Stalin that he cannot expect the same immunity as media and news channels.

    Stalin had sought clubbing of multiple FIRs registered against him for his "eradicate Sanatan Dharma remark."

    The bench, consisting of Justices Sanjiv Khanna and Dipankar Datta, noted that Stalin had made these remarks voluntarily.

    Context

    Why does this story matter?

    Last September, Stalin compared "Sanatan Dharma" to diseases like dengue, malaria, COVID-19, etc., saying it should be eradicated.

    While Stalin said he was referring to the caste system, the ruling Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP) and other Hindu organizations condemned his statement.

    Later, several DMK and Congress leaders allegedly came to his defense.

    The remarks left the opposition bloc, the Indian National Developmental Inclusive Alliance (INDIA), of which the DMK is a member, open to BJP attacks.

    Legal argument

    Stalin's defense and Supreme Court's response

    In his defense, Stalin referred to rulings from cases involving journalists like Arnab Goswami of Republic TV, Mohammed Zubair, Amish Devgan, and Nupur Sharma.

    However, the bench clarified that his situation was distinct from those of media personnel.

    The court emphasized that he could not equate himself with the media as the cases he mentioned involved journalists following their superiors' orders for TRPs.

    Legal query

    Court questions Stalin's choice of legal remedy

    Abhishek Manu Singhvi, a senior advocate representing Stalin, cited BJP spokesperson Nupur Sharma's case where multiple FIRs were transferred to one state.

    The Supreme Court queried why Stalin had chosen to file a petition under Article 32 (remedies for enforcement of fundamental rights) of the Constitution instead of invoking Section 406 (power of Supreme Court to transfer cases and appeals) of the Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC).

    Legal direction

    Court directs Stalin to revise plea, sets hearing date

    The court instructed Stalin to revise his plea and submit it under Section 406 CrPC.

    The case is scheduled for hearing in the week starting May 6.

    Previously, the apex court had expressed its disapproval over Stalin's comments reminding him that he is a minister and should be mindful of his statements' repercussions.

    Facebook
    Whatsapp
    Twitter
    Linkedin
    Related News
    Latest
    Udhayanidhi Stalin
    Arnab Goswami
    Nupur Sharma
    Supreme Court Of India

    Latest

    Bangladesh Cricket Board pondering over Bangladesh's tour of Pakistan Bangladesh Cricket Board
    Why Virat Kohli's presence could lift India in England? Stats Virat Kohli
    Google Workspace accounts gain access to Gemini Live feature Google
    Adani Group deploys India's 1st hydrogen-powered truck in Chhattisgarh Adani Group

    Udhayanidhi Stalin

    Sanatan row: Eminent citizens urge CJI to act against Udhayanidhi MK Stalin
    Sanatana row: Udhayanidhi raises discrimination issue, cites President Murmu, Mahabharat Droupadi Murmu
    Udhayanidhi, Priyank Kharge booked for outraging religious sentiments Priyank Kharge
    Needs proper response: PM Modi on Sanatan row Narendra Modi

    Arnab Goswami

    Republic TV outperforms Times now in debut week India
    From corporate to politics: These Indian women are dominating India
    Padmavati: Chittorgarh Fort shuts down for first time since independence Deepika Padukone
    'Padmavati' release delayed amid increasing controversies Deepika Padukone

    Nupur Sharma

    Nupur Sharma suspension: What is Rule 10(a) of BJP Constitution? Gulf Cooperation Council
    Ex-BJP spokesperson Nupur Sharma gets police security amid threats Delhi Police
    al-Qaeda threatens suicide attacks in India over Prophet remarks al Qaeda
    Prophet remarks: Reasons why India can't ignore Gulf outrage India

    Supreme Court Of India

    Electoral bonds case: Supreme Court to hear SBI's request today DY Chandrachud
    Disclose electoral bonds' details by tomorrow: SC reprimands SBI State Bank of India (SBI)
    Congress moves SC against appointments of election commissioners Congress Party
    Election commission briefs over 2,100 observers for Lok Sabha elections Election Commission of India (ECI)
    Indian Premier League (IPL) Celebrity Hollywood Bollywood UEFA Champions League Tennis Football Smartphones Cryptocurrency Upcoming Movies Premier League Cricket News Latest automobiles Latest Cars Upcoming Cars Latest Bikes Upcoming Tablets
    About Us Privacy Policy Terms & Conditions Contact Us Ethical Conduct Grievance Redressal News News Archive Topics Archive Download DevBytes Find Cricket Statistics
    Follow us on
    Facebook Twitter Linkedin
    All rights reserved © NewsBytes 2025